Precedent Transactions: Funded Medical Malpractice Claims
Since 2017, Uplift Legal Funding has helped medical malpractice plaintiffs get the financial support they need. Below is a selection of our results. For more information on Uplift’s funding for medical malpractice cases, visit our medical malpractice funding page.
Medical Malpractice Claim Funding Examples
Texas Failure to Diagnose
$11,000
Funded in 2026
Medical malpractice claim involving the delayed diagnosis of a medical condition.
Texas Surgical Error
$110,000
Funded in 2024
Medical malpractice claim arising from complications from surgery.
New Jersey Surgical Error
$5,000
Funded in 2024
Medical malpractice case arising from alleged errors during surgery.
Oregon Surgical Error
$65,000
Funded in 2023
Claim arising from a surgical error in which a medical professional unintentionally caused a significant injury.
New York Surgical Error
$50,000
Funded in 2022
The plaintiff suffered severe injuries due to surgery.
Massachusetts Failure to Diagnose
$50,000
Funded in 2021
Medical malpractice claim involving a failure to diagnose a serious condition. Our client was able to use the funding to get by during a lengthy litigation process.
Louisiana Failure to Diagnose
$25,000
Funded in 2021
Medical malpractice claim in which a hospital failed to diagnose and treat a serious condition.
Louisiana Medication Error
$8,000
Funded in 2020
Medical malpractice claim where the plaintiff suffered injuries from a medication error.
Texas Surgical Error
$10,000
Funded in 2019
Medical malpractice case arising from surgical error.
Florida Surgical Error
$7,000
Funded in 2019
Surgical malpractice that resulted in severe injuries, requiring further medical treatment.
Washington Surgical Error
$50,000
Funded in 2018
Surgical error that required further corrective surgery.
New York Failure to Diagnose
$125,000
Funded in 2018
Medical malpractice claim arising from a failure to diagnose a serious condition.
Disclaimer: Our results are provided are for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as guarantees of similar outcomes. Every legal case is unique, and funding decisions are made based on the specific details and merits of each case.
By
Jared Stern
Updated 7/20/2026